The Analyst's Path

Phase 5 · Industry and sector mastery · free

The Consulting Deck and the Project Readout

PR5.01 · 19,816 words

Twenty-five pages. A forty-five minute slot, of which three go to introductions and twelve are held back for discussion, leaving thirty minutes of presenting time. That is 72 seconds a page, and nobody has ever presented a page of analysis in 72 seconds.

Read the whole module in the app All Phase 5 modules

Learning objectives

You can:

  1. Name the three parts of the action-title consulting deck (executive summary, horizontal-logic body, indexed appendix), state the job each part does for a specific reader, and size each part against the meeting it serves.
  2. Write an executive summary page that carries a governing thought and three or four key lines, each key line resting on one headline figure, and defend the decision to write that page last.
  3. Build a body page to the four-element anatomy (action title, one exhibit, a source-and-date line, one supporting sentence), and reject a page that carries a second claim.
  4. Apply the appendix contract: decide what leaves the body, index it so a partner can reach a page in one instruction, and answer a hostile question with a page number rather than a promise.
  5. Structure a project readout in its five-part sequence (objective, findings, recommendation, next steps, owners and dates), and say why that order is fixed by governance rather than by rhetoric.
  6. Write a findings page that puts evidence before conclusion, and keep one disconfirming finding in the deck with the reason it survives review.
  7. Write next steps that are actionable: one owner by role, one date, one measurable first move, and the value the step carries with any double-count between steps disclosed.
  8. Apply the two shipped templates to a live brief, filling the storyline placeholders before any exhibit is built, and check the result with the read-only-the-titles test.
  9. Adapt either archetype for a hostile audience, stating precisely what changes (sourcing density, appendix depth, method placement) and what must not change.
  10. Separate the pre-read from the presented cut, price both in reader-minutes, and diagnose the archetype failure where a decision memo would have served better than a deck.

Prerequisites & connections

Builds on. Nothing outside this branch is a gate. The pyramid, the action title and the read-only-the-titles test are assumed as working knowledge, and if any of the three is unfamiliar the storytelling branch (PR4.01, PR4.02) supplies them in a form this branch can use directly. Chart-form choice is used constantly below and is never taught here; PR2.01 owns it and PR2.03 owns the one-message rule and the action title as chart craft. A learner arriving from the consulting galaxy with CN1.03 already done will recognise the governing thought under a different name and can move faster through the executive-summary material.

Feeds forward. PR5.02 takes the archetype idea to the board deck and the investor pitch, where the reader's job changes from being persuaded to being accountable, and the structure changes with it. PR5.03 takes it to the research deck and the model walkthrough. PR6.01 delivers what is built here, including the Q&A discipline that the appendix index exists to serve. PR7.01 runs the whole sequence end to end on one brief, and expects both templates to be usable from memory by then.

Five neighbours own material that touches this one, and none of it is rebuilt here. CN7.03 owns the consulting engagement capstone: the whole client engagement, from scoping through to the final presentation, with the deck as one of its deliverables; what is owned here is the deck craft that capstone consumes. PR4.01 owns the executive storyline, the pyramid, SCQA and SCR, so the governing thought arrives here already formed. PR4.02 owns action titles, horizontal logic and vertical logic; the body section below assumes a title stack that already passes those tests and shows what to hang under it. M10.03 owns the written analyst's deliverables, the memo and the one-pager, and the failure case at the end points there rather than competing with it. PR2.02 owns decluttering, colour discipline and the data-ink argument; where an exhibit below is called clean, that is the standard being invoked, not a new one.

1. What an archetype is, and why a deck shape is worth memorising

A reader opening a deck spends the first fifteen seconds working out what kind of document it is, which is a different question from what it says. Until that is settled they cannot decide where to start, what to skip, or whether the absence of something is an omission or a convention.

This page is an excerpt

The full module runs to 19,816 words and carries the worked examples, the tables, the quiz that gates the next module and the spaced-repetition deck built from it. All of it is free and none of it needs an account.

Read the whole module All 228 modules
Previous: The Data Story: Narrative Arc and the Big Idea Next: The Board Deck and the Investor Pitch