Switch industries, but keep asking where the truth lives. For an Indian residential developer it doesn't live in the income statement, and the reason is mechanical.
When do developers recognise revenue under Ind AS 115?
A developer's product takes 3 to 5 years to build. The customer signs and starts paying in year 0 (the booking), pays construction-linked installments through years 1 to 4, and takes possession in year 4 or 5. Under Ind AS 115, the five-step model from your accounting work, Indian residential sale agreements generally fail the over-time recognition tests. Control of the asset doesn't pass to the customer as it's built. The standard's escape hatch, an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, typically isn't met either. So revenue is recognized at a point in time, on completion or possession, when control transfers. Until FY18, developers used percentage-of-completion under the old Guidance Note, and the FY19 transition famously reversed previously booked revenue back out of retained earnings.
So this year's P&L revenue is roughly the homes sold 3 to 5 years ago, at prices 3 to 5 years old. Nothing about this year's demand or pricing shows up in it, and neither does market share.
Advertisement
Why do sales and revenue differ, and what should you track?
Make it concrete. Meridian Estates (synthetic) launches a 1.2 mn sqft project in FY24 and sells 60% of it that year at ₹9,500/sqft. That's a blockbuster ₹684 cr of bookings. And its FY24 reported revenue? It's whatever older projects happened to reach possession in FY24, which could be near zero or a spike from one big completion. Reported revenue will lurch upward in FY27-28, when this project completes, long after the economic event. Someone reading the P&L sees famine and then feast. Inside the business, FY24 was a smooth boom.
Every "Developer revenue doubles" or "Developer revenue crashes 40%" headline is, more often than not, an artifact of which towers got completion certificates that year.
So the sector runs on an operational disclosure stack instead. To their credit, Indian developers have published it quarterly in investor presentations since 2018:
- The real top line is pre-sales or bookings (₹ cr and mn sqft): the value of units sold this period, whether or not a rupee of revenue is recognized. This is the number that moves the stock and defines market share, and it leads the P&L by 3 to 5 years.
- Its partner is collections (₹ cr), the cash actually received from customers against construction milestones. Collections are the quality check on bookings.
How does this differ for US homebuilders?
Now the US contrast, so you hold both maps. A D.R. Horton/Lennar-style homebuilder builds a house in 4 to 8 months and recognizes revenue at closing, so its P&L lags reality by only months. Its real-time panel is net orders, backlog, cancellation rate and absorption pace per community. Its risk is on the balance sheet, in land. In 2008 land impairments vaporized homebuilder book values. The modern US playbook went "land-light" in response: builders control lots through options and rent the land risk instead of holding it. US homebuilders are valued substantially on P/B vs through-cycle ROE. That's a cyclical manufacturer's lens, and US builders get it in place of a P/NAV lens because their inventory turns. An Indian developer's land bank mostly doesn't.